Consumptive*no comments looks good *Use: ITRC-METRIC (Mapping of EvapoTranspiration with Internal Calibration)
General Description | The ITRC-METRIC process is based on a surface energy balance and includes corrections for aerodynamic resistance. It depends upon both accurate and frequent LandSAT satellite thermal images and understanding of the cropping systems within a region. The METRIC programs have gradually evolved from research in the US and other countries with the objective of being able to directly estimate actual ET over large areas with limited data availability (such as crop type, irrigation method, irrigation practices, etc.). | ||||||
Model Domain | Evapotranspiration of land uses for Californian crops. | ||||||
Developer | The Irrigation Training & Research Center (ITRC) at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo | ||||||
Hardware computing requirements | None specified | ||||||
Code language | None specified | ||||||
Original application | Contracted by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to compute actual evapotranspiration (ETc) from vegetation throughout the California Delta for 2015 and 2016. | ||||||
Public/proprietary and cost | All equations publically available. | ||||||
Physically or empirically based | Empirical | ||||||
Mathematical methods used | ITRC utilizes a grass reference ETo basis for all aspects of METRIC as well as integration of raster based ETo for interpolation, in contrast with original METRIC methods which used alfalfa. | ||||||
Input data requirements |
| ||||||
Outputs | Raster imagery of ET values (12 band, one for each month) | ||||||
Pre-processing and post-processing tools | REF-ET software or other methods needed to calculate ETo values (Spatial CIMIS may be effective). | ||||||
Representation of uncertainty | No specific representation | ||||||
Prevalence | Commonly accepted method of ET assessment – part of OpenET | ||||||
Ease of use for public entities | Requires user with a strong knowledge of agricultural practices in the study area and capability with GIS or access to high quality, corrected data sources (specifically Spatial CIMIS, land cover data). | ||||||
Ease of obtaining information and availability of technical support | Scientific basis widely available, manuals and help on applications are scarce. | ||||||
Source code availability | None | ||||||
Status of model development | No further direction specified, most recent report dated 2016. | ||||||
Challenges for integration | ET methods require cloud-free satellite imagery, which may not be available for desired modeling period or at frequency needed for other models. Raster imagery may need to be scaled for other model output boundaries. |
References:
Allen, R. G., Tasumi, M., Morse, A., Trezza, R., Wright, J. L., Bastiaanssen, W., … Robison, C. W. (2007). Satellite-Based Energy Balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)—Applications. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:4(395)
Howes, D. J., Fox, P., & Hutton, P. H. (2015). Evapotranspiration from Natural Vegetation in the Central Valley of California: Monthly Grass Reference-Based Vegetation Coefficients and the Dual Crop Coefficient Approach. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(10), 04015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001162
Howes, D. J. (2017). A Comparative Study for Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta - Appendix F. Irrigation Training and Research Center Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration (ITRC-METRIC). Davis, CA.